Prohibition of UNRWA’s Activitie

This analysis examines the legal and political consequences of Israel's prohibition of UNRWA activities, examines the legal and political consequences of Israel's prohibition of UNRWA activities, focusing on the interactions between the United Nations, the United States, Israel, Palestine, and Turkey. Although the decision has sparked countless debates at the regional and global levels, it remains one of the most critical issues in the context of Palestine's legitimacy and the protection of the fundamental rights of refugees.

🖇️Please click here to access the analysis article titled “Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Prohibition of UNRWA Activities.”

 

Prohibition of UNRWA’s Activitie

Legal and Humanitarian Consequences for Palestine

This analysis focuses on the regional and global consequences of the Israeli Parliament's decision to prohibit UNRWA's activities. Israel's move has not only prevented more than six million Palestinian refugees from accessing humanitarian services, but has also directly affected fundamental legal and political issues such as the right of return and the protection of refugee status.

In the vote at the UN General Assembly, 137 countries opposed the ban and supported Palestine's legitimacy, while the US and Israel rejected this initiative and took a position that conflicts with international law. Turkey, on the other hand, reiterated its support for an independent Palestinian state and reminded Israel of its obligations under international law as an occupying power.

Although this process has sparked countless debates, the continuation of UNRWA's existence is of critical importance not only for the continuity of humanitarian aid but also for the protection of the fundamental rights of the Palestinian people.